Hailuo 2.3 vs Wan 2.5
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, speed, and quality.
Verdict
Both Hailuo 2.3 and Wan 2.5 are budget-tier models. Hailuo 2.3 stands out for best human motion at budget price, while Wan 2.5 offers multilingual + native audio sync.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Hailuo 2.3 | Wan 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Wan Video |
| Tier | budget | budget |
| Credit Cost | 1 ($0.50) | 1 ($0.50) |
| Generation Time | ~60s | ~120s |
| Audio Generation | ||
| Negative Prompt | ||
| Aspect Ratio Control | ||
| Duration Control | ||
| Seed Control | ||
| Quality Presets |
Best For
Hailuo 2.3
Best human motion at budget price
- Realistic human motion
- Cinematic VFX
- Strong style adherence
- Up to 768p resolution
Wan 2.5
Multilingual + native audio sync
- Native audio sync
- Multilingual prompt support
- 720p output (1280x720)
- Up to 5 second duration
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Comparisons
Hailuo 2.3 vs Veo 3.1 Fastbudget vs premium · 1 vs 5 creditsVeo 3.1 Fast vs Wan 2.5premium vs budget · 5 vs 1 creditsRunway Gen-4.5 vs Hailuo 2.3premium vs budget · 5 vs 1 creditsRunway Gen-4.5 vs Wan 2.5premium vs budget · 5 vs 1 creditsHailuo 2.3 vs Kling 3.0budget vs standard · 1 vs 2 creditsKling 3.0 vs Wan 2.5standard vs budget · 2 vs 1 credits
Try both models and decide for yourself
Your first video is free. Generate with any model and compare the results side by side.
Generate Your First Video