P-Video vs Veo 3.1 Fast
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, speed, and quality.
Verdict
Google Veo 3.1 Fast and P-Video have different settings and credit requirements. P-Video starts at 1 credit per video at default settings. Compare supported inputs, output formats, and your actual results before choosing; price tier alone does not establish output quality.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | P-Video | Veo 3.1 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Pruna AI | Google DeepMind |
| Tier | budget | premium |
| Credits at default settings | 1 credits ($0.40–$0.66 in pack value) | 8 credits ($3.20–$5.31 in pack value) |
| Approximate generation time | Varies with demand | ~60s |
| Optional audio control | ||
| Negative Prompt | ||
| Aspect Ratio Control | ||
| Duration Control | ||
| Seed Control | ||
| Quality / resolution control |
Controls reflect what VideoForge exposes. Veo generates audio with every request; Wan uses its native audio behavior without a separate switch. A missing audio control does not mean the output is silent. Times are estimates, not head-to-head measurements.
Best For
P-Video
Recommended for everyday clips with audio
- Text-to-video and image-to-video
- Native audio with a mute option
- 720p and 1080p output
- 5–20 seconds in the generator
Veo 3.1 Fast
Context-aware audio generation
- Context-aware audio generation
- Higher-fidelity video output
- Image-to-video support
- Multiple aspect ratios (16:9, 9:16, 1:1)
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Comparisons
Try both models and decide for yourself
Choose a credit pack with enough credits for the models and settings you want to compare.
Start Creating